1c1g Optimize
Great idea 👍 I’ll treat this as two publish-ready tech articles you can post on a blog / Medium / dev.to. Because these articles contain shell commands, I will not use writing blocks (per UI rules) and instead give you clean Markdown-style content with proper code blocks.
Article 1
How to Optimize an Ubuntu 1C1G Cloud Server (A Practical, Proven Guide)
Introduction
Running a cloud server with 1 CPU and 1GB RAM is common for personal projects, landing pages, and small websites. However, default Ubuntu installations are not optimized for such low-resource environments, often leading to:
- High memory usage
- Random freezes
- OOM (Out of Memory) kills
- Poor performance under small traffic spikes
This article walks through real, production-tested optimizations to make Ubuntu stable, predictable, and usable on a 1C1G server.
1. The Core Principle: Reduce, Don’t Tune Blindly
On a 1C1G server, optimization is mostly about removing unnecessary components, not endless tuning.
Key rules:
- Fewer background services
- Fewer resident daemons
- Predictable memory usage
- Swap is mandatory
2. Enable Swap (Non-Negotiable)
Many cloud images ship without swap, which is dangerous on low memory machines.
1
2
3
4
5
sudo fallocate -l 512M /swapfile
sudo chmod 600 /swapfile
sudo mkswap /swapfile
sudo swapon /swapfile
echo '/swapfile none swap sw 0 0' | sudo tee -a /etc/fstab
Verify:
1
free -h
Why this matters:
- Prevents sudden OOM kills
- Absorbs short memory spikes
- Improves system stability dramatically
3. Adjust Kernel Memory Behavior
Reduce aggressive swapping and cache pressure:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
sudo tee /etc/sysctl.d/99-1c1g.conf <<EOF
vm.swappiness=10
vm.vfs_cache_pressure=200
vm.dirty_ratio=10
vm.dirty_background_ratio=5
EOF
sudo sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/99-1c1g.conf
4. Install earlyoom (Fail Fast, Not Freeze)
Instead of letting the system hang:
1
2
3
sudo apt update
sudo apt install -y earlyoom
sudo systemctl enable --now earlyoom
This kills memory-hogging processes before the kernel panics.
5. Remove Ubuntu’s Server-Unfriendly Services
Ubuntu enables many services that are useless on cloud servers.
Disable them:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
sudo systemctl disable --now \
snapd \
fwupd \
multipathd \
iscsid \
packagekit \
unattended-upgrades
Remove snap completely if unused:
1
2
sudo apt purge -y snapd
sudo rm -rf /snap /var/snap /var/lib/snapd /var/cache/snapd
Memory saved: 100–200MB
6. Limit systemd Journal Size
Unbounded logs silently eat disk and memory:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
sudo mkdir -p /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d
sudo tee /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/limit.conf <<EOF
[Journal]
SystemMaxUse=50M
RuntimeMaxUse=20M
EOF
sudo systemctl restart systemd-journald
7. Optimize MySQL for Low Memory
MySQL is often the largest memory consumer.
Edit:
1
sudo nano /etc/mysql/mysql.conf.d/mysqld.cnf
Add under [mysqld]:
1
2
3
4
5
innodb_buffer_pool_size = 128M
innodb_log_buffer_size = 8M
max_connections = 20
performance_schema = OFF
table_open_cache = 400
Restart:
1
sudo systemctl restart mysql
8. Tune PHP-FPM Conservatively
For PHP 8.x:
1
sudo nano /etc/php/8.3/fpm/pool.d/www.conf
Recommended settings:
1
2
3
4
5
pm = dynamic
pm.max_children = 2
pm.start_servers = 1
pm.min_spare_servers = 1
pm.max_spare_servers = 1
9. What “Healthy” Looks Like
1
free -h
Expected:
- Available memory ≥ 450–550MB
- Swap usage < 100MB
- No frequent CPU spikes
- No OOM events
Conclusion
A 1C1G Ubuntu server can be perfectly stable if treated correctly.
The key is not powerful hardware—but intentional minimalism.
Article 2
Building a Website on a 1C1G Server: Technology Choices, Pros & Cons
Introduction
Once your 1C1G server is optimized, the next question is:
What website stack should I actually run on this thing?
Not all web technologies are equal under resource constraints. This article compares popular website-building approaches, focusing on performance, maintainability, and suitability for low-end servers.
1. Static Sites (Best Choice for 1C1G)
Examples
- Hugo
- Astro (static output)
- Jekyll
- Hexo
Pros
- No database
- No runtime backend
- Near-zero memory usage
- Extremely secure
- Handles traffic spikes easily
Cons
- Content editing workflow may feel less “CMS-like”
- Requires rebuild to publish changes
Best For
- Homepages
- Blogs
- Landing pages
- Documentation sites
2. Static Site + Visual Editor (Best Balance)
Example
- Publii + Nginx
Architecture:
- Visual editor runs on your local machine
- Server only serves static files
Pros
- True WYSIWYG editing
- Zero server-side processing
- Ideal for non-developers
- Almost no maintenance
Cons
- Editing not done directly on server
Verdict
👉 The most practical solution for 1C1G servers
3. Traditional CMS (WordPress)
Pros
- Huge ecosystem
- Familiar admin interface
- Plugins for everything
Cons
- PHP + MySQL memory overhead
- Security maintenance burden
- Poor performance without tuning
Verdict
⚠️ Acceptable only with strict optimization ❌ Overkill for simple homepages
4. Headless CMS + Static Frontend
Examples
- Hugo + Decap CMS
- Next.js static export + CMS
Pros
- Online editing
- Clean separation of content & presentation
- Modern workflow
Cons
- Setup complexity
- Git-based workflow may confuse non-technical users
5. Node.js CMS (Ghost, Strapi)
Pros
- Modern interfaces
- API-driven
Cons
- High memory usage
- Database dependency
- Poor fit for 1C1G
Verdict
❌ Not recommended
6. Comparison Table
| Stack | Memory Usage | Stability | Ease of Use | 1C1G Friendly |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static (Hugo) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ✅ |
| Publii | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ✅ |
| WordPress | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⚠️ |
| Headless CMS | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⚠️ |
| Node CMS | ⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ❌ |
Final Recommendation
For a 1C1G cloud server:
Static-first architectures are not a compromise—they are the optimal design.
If you need:
- Maximum stability → Static site
- Visual editing → Publii
- Dynamic features → Carefully optimized WordPress
If you want, next I can:
- Edit these into Medium / dev.to formatting
- Add SEO titles & summaries
- Turn them into a series with diagrams
- Localize them into Chinese or bilingual versions
Just tell me how you plan to publish them.