Post

Mastering Code Reviews: Best Practices and Anti-Patterns

Posted
By Joey
2 min read

Mastering Code Reviews: Best Practices and Anti-Patterns

As an experienced software developer, I’ve participated in countless code reviews. Effective code reviews are crucial—they not only maintain code quality but also build stronger, more knowledgeable teams. Here, I share essential best practices and common anti-patterns to help your team maximize the value of code reviews.

Best Practices

  1. Automate the Mundane:

    • Integrate tools like linters (e.g., ESLint, Black), static analyzers (SonarQube), and automated formatters (Prettier) directly into your CI pipeline.
    • Automating style and syntax checks allows reviewers to focus on deeper, more meaningful concerns.

  2. Prioritize Small, Focused PRs:

    • Smaller pull requests (PRs) lead to more thorough, effective reviews.
    • Clearly scoped changes enable reviewers to understand and quickly provide actionable feedback.

  3. Maintain Constructive Communication:

    • Feedback should be clear, precise, and constructive. Avoid vague critiques.
    • Limit async back-and-forth discussions to two rounds; if an issue persists, discuss synchronously via a quick video call or face-to-face.

  4. Explicitly Separate Concerns:

    • Clearly distinguish between business logic, system design, security implications, and code maintainability.
    • Structured reviews help ensure comprehensive feedback and improve clarity for authors.

  5. Enforce Testing and Coverage:

    • Changes in the codebase must come with appropriate test coverage.
    • Ensure CI checks explicitly validate the link between code modifications and associated tests.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Style Wars in PR Comments:

    • Arguing over stylistic choices in comments wastes precious developer time.
    • Adopt standardized, automated tools and remove subjective style debates from review conversations.

  2. Massive PRs:

    • Large PRs overwhelm reviewers and often lead to superficial or incomplete reviews.
    • Break large features or refactors into incremental, independently reviewable pieces.

  3. Endless Async Discussions:

    • Prolonged back-and-forth comment threads decrease productivity and slow down development cycles.
    • When discussions extend beyond two rounds, switch to synchronous conversations.

  4. Overlooking Business Context:

    • Reviewing code without understanding its business purpose or requirements leads to missed critical issues.
    • Ensure PR descriptions and linked issues clearly communicate the “why” behind changes.

  5. Neglecting Security & Scalability:

    • Focusing solely on functional correctness while ignoring security and scalability is dangerous.
    • Always explicitly consider performance implications, data security, and privacy during reviews.

Final Thoughts

Effective code reviews are more than just gatekeeping—they’re a key part of continuous learning, collaborative improvement, and maintaining high standards. By following these best practices and avoiding common pitfalls, your team can significantly enhance both productivity and software quality.

code review best practices anti-patterns
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.